Hal, I know this is a wxperl group, but hasn't you given any thought to a web basted application? That way the customer doesn't have to download a client for their computer, and you only have to maintain one code base, not to mention the inherent problems of installing and running perl across multiple different versions of windows/*nix.
I hope I don't get flamed for recommending a non-wxPerl solution on the wxPerl mailing list; in my opinion it would be easier and more efficient to use, build, maintain, and deploy, mod_perl, FastCGI, or even the standard CGI modules (depending on server load), then to deploy your solution to each individuals desktop, laptop, etc. That's my $.02, If anyone has a differing opinion I am extremely interested in hearing it. Thanks for listening. Jon On Apr 11, 2011 4:23 AM, "jeff" <j...@roqc.no> wrote: I would also recommend the Cava packager and Citrus Perl. No hassle, self contained builds with obfuscated code and built in installer. Won't have same look, but the install effort is close to zero. Clients just download and run. Use LWP to keep data on your webserver. We're loving it - it blows Activestate away. Jeff On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 06:12 -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Mark Dootson wr... > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________
