On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 13:04 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: <snip> > > For example I've tried to tweak my SSH server but despite some improvements > > in responsiveness video playback (I tried a youtube video) is still choppy. > > NoMachine has announced that NXv4 will have support for videos, > animations etc. If X2go continues using NX libraries and the NX video > stuff will be released as GPL then there probably is a chance of being > able to use animated graphics in the near(?) future. I guess that > NXing video streams will be quite CPU intensive, though. So this will > probably not be suitable for terminal servers. > > However, if you can play a video file locally then you should prefer that!!! > (there is no real need to X2go-tunnel Youtube, is it?) <snip> Actually, we do see a need. When replacing physical desktops with virtual ones, users don't relish jumping back and forth. Being able to do all things from one desktop is important from a user perspective.
We are also seeing video becoming more important in educational settings. X2Go seems ideal for schools but a frequent stumbling block in our presentations to date has been handling video. The actual video handling libraries seem to be out of scope of X2Go as it just uses the NX libraries but is anyone familiar with HP's RGS (http://h20331.www2.hp.com/hpsub/cache/286504-0-0-225-121.html)? It seems to vary the compression method used based upon what it is transmitting thus it handles video differently from, say, text. I have never used it and have no idea how it works but, unlike SPICE, it is being presented as a WAN friendly protocol. Thanks - John _______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev