Hi Alex, On Mo 30 Jan 2012 15:11:51 CET Oleksandr Shneyder wrote:
Hm, I'm not sure. I think, the users should be able to decide it.
Yes, that's what I think, too. And, I also think the distro maintainers should decide whether libjpeg-turbo is used on the distro and also whether libjpeg is fully replaced by libjpeg-turbo or whether libjpeg-turbo is an option for the distro users.
Unfortunately, Debian does not have libjpeg-turbo in SID yet.
But we can make configuration of X2Go with libjpeg-turbo be easier. For example, if user have already installed libjpeg-turbo_1.1.90_i386.deb from http://sourceforge.net/projects/libjpeg-turbo/files/1.1.90%20%281.2beta1%29/ , agent wrapper can check if directory /opt/libjpeg-turbo/lib/ exists and export it to LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'm not sure that we should provide libjpeg-turbo by ourself.
I am not sure on this...Currently, I think, offering the packages for Debian in the nightly repositories should be all we do. People have a .deb based installation source for the library (which we already do for Debian squeeze, wheezy and sid) and once installed, people can use dpkg-divert to select which JPEG lib they can use. As long as we do not have proper test results and a proof that libjpeg-turbo is a great enhancement, we should not customize X2Go to use it.
Once we have test results, the distros may already have incorporated it in their archives and this discussion becomes pointless, anyway...
Greets, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpSABX9MctlQ.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
_______________________________________________ X2Go-Dev mailing list X2Go-Dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
