For me it will be fine. Anyway, I'm ignoring all the message based on
xalan-j.
Regards,
Cip
Bjoern Martin wrote:
> > > I had problems with Xalan-J 1.x and newer versions of Xerces as
> > > well. The solving workaround was to switch to Xalan-J 2.1.0 which
> > > works fine with Xerces-J 1.4.1
> >
> > Unfortunately I've wrote an API based an C++ version of Xerces and
> > Xalan [...]
>
> Isn't this a good reason to split the development list into xalan-j-
> dev and xalan-c-dev?
> (if i'm alone with this opinion please ignore this mail, thx)
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Bjoern Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
