Re: Candidate 1.4 distributions

[David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM]

OK.  I'm going to get rid of that code anyway, since it's ancient and no
longer being used.

I'm going to pull down a copy of gcc 3.2 and make sure the latest code
remains compatible with 3.2.

Thanks for reporting this.

Dave



                                                                                       
                                               
                      Holger Floerke                                                   
                                               
                      <floerke@doctron         To:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]       
                                               
                      ic.de>                   cc:      (bcc: David N 
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)                                          
                                               Subject: Re: Candidate 1.4 
distributions                                               
                      09/19/2002 10:45                                                 
                                               
                      PM                                                               
                                               
                      Please respond                                                   
                                               
                      to xalan-dev                                                     
                                               
                                                                                       
                                               
                                                                                       
                                               



Hi David,

>Sounds like you're building with -d for debug?
Nope.

>I haven't tried that
>recently, but it should work.  Did you by any chance build some things
with
>debug and other without?
Nope. I just build xerces-c and xalan-c without making any changes on
Makefiles.

>We are currently supporting gcc 3.1, since that seems to be the most
>popular version on Linux right now.  Maybe I should download 3.2, build
it,
>and see what's going on.
I think the compiler/linker removes the NOP-Function with optimization
turned on. I break off wondering about gcc optimization...

HolgeR