Re: XSLT/XQuery serialization: toward a separate implementation

[scott_boag]

I think it's a good idea.  I also think you should float this up to the general list.  -scott

Lionel Villard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/01/2003 11:03:20 AM:

>
> Hi all,
>         with the forthcoming W3C recommendation for XSLT 2.0 and
> XQuery 1.0 serialization, it'd be great whether we can provide a
> separate implementation from the xslt processing. I think it should
> not be so hard and long to cut dependencies with Xalan in the org.
> apache.xalan.serialize package. What do you think? Should we also
> provide an other package name, like org.apache.xquery.serialization
> (xquery because the serialization may belong to the data model of
> xpath/xquery and xslt relies on this datamodel) ?
>
> Thanks!        
> Lionel Villard
> IBM Research