---- you "Walsh, Eric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ---- > For the record I say you just throw the old routines back > in and call it even, especially since very little of my > XPath queries are XSLT originated.
I know there are definite issues with our XPathAPI performance, but I think this is actually a bigger question about Xalan's direction. How does this fit in with the (in my mind) goal to have Xalan be the most conformant XSLT processor for running stylesheets in a variety of situations. It sounds like we have a lot more power users of our XPath functionality than perhaps we had expected. But I'd be nervous if XPath customizations caused instability or problems for our general stylesheet users. I guess part of this is also because we have a limited number of active committers, so there's only so much we can do without more developers submitting patches back and helping with the work. (Maybe I'm just being paranoid, and we can make a few tweaks that will help out the straight XPath users without affecting general stylesheet processing...) - Shane ===== <eof aka="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "http://www.otnemem.com/"=.sig /> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
