I know _we've_ all upgraded (except for folks running MSVJ+, whom even Microsoft has abandoned)... but when we asked this a year or so ago, some of you said you had customers who were absolutely unwilling to upgrade.
I think it's time to ask whether that's still an issue, and whether Xalan wants to continue to cater to (and be limited by) that audience. Sticking with the older classes may be costing us performance, though that hasn't been firmly established yet.
So: If we cut over, how loud will the explosion be?
(I think Shane actually asked this a few weeks back and got no response, which suggests that everyone's pretty happy with the idea, but I want to make sure before I start investing significant effort in finding out whether it'd help us.)
- Re: Second call: Does anyone still really require Java 1.... joseph_kesselman
- Re: Second call: Does anyone still really require Ja... Shane Curcuru
- RE: Second call: Does anyone still really requir... Gary L Peskin
- Re: Second call: Does anyone still really requir... Chris McCabe
- RE: Second call: Does anyone still really requir... Mikko Honkala
- Re: Second call: Does anyone still really require Ja... joseph_kesselman
- RE: Second call: Does anyone still really require Ja... joseph_kesselman
