Hi Tatu / Mukul, Thanks for your responses.
1/. We are trying to compile in the linux environment and check out the timings. I will post the details after we try this out. 2/. Tatu - we are giving sufficient time for JVM to warm-up. First we run a load test with 1 user for 15 minutes. After this test, we ran with 3 users for 1/2 hour. The times I mentioned below are average time taken for around 1500 transactions. Thanks, Sriram Tatu Saloranta wrote: > > --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Mukul Gandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... >> Also I wrote, the execution timing on both the OSs is < 1 second. To >> my opinion, you can ignore such a small difference. > > Or more precisely: the methodology for testing seems flawed. Because of > the way modern JVMs work, single run without sufficient warmup time and > repetitions only tests how fast JVM can ramp up things. > It tells very little about application or library performance. > > To get a realistic picture, one needs to run multiple transformations; > first to "warm up" JVM (since it will load in system libraries, hot spot > compiler will compile some byte code to native code etc), and only then > measure. And measure multiple runs as well. > > -+ Tatu +- > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XSL-Transformation-in-Xalan---Pls-help%21-tp19471054p19489002.html Sent from the Xalan - J - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
