We compiled the files in the linux box. We were not able to see any differences in the performance.
Has anyone faced a similar situation for XSL transformation in Linux? Thanks, Sriram Sriram83 wrote: > > Hi Tatu / Mukul, > > Thanks for your responses. > > 1/. We are trying to compile in the linux environment and check out the > timings. I will post the details after we try this out. > > 2/. Tatu - we are giving sufficient time for JVM to warm-up. First we run > a load test with 1 user for 15 minutes. After this test, we ran with 3 > users for 1/2 hour. The times I mentioned below are average time taken for > around 1500 transactions. > > Thanks, > Sriram > > > Tatu Saloranta wrote: >> >> --- On Sat, 9/13/08, Mukul Gandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> ... >>> Also I wrote, the execution timing on both the OSs is < 1 second. To >>> my opinion, you can ignore such a small difference. >> >> Or more precisely: the methodology for testing seems flawed. Because of >> the way modern JVMs work, single run without sufficient warmup time and >> repetitions only tests how fast JVM can ramp up things. >> It tells very little about application or library performance. >> >> To get a realistic picture, one needs to run multiple transformations; >> first to "warm up" JVM (since it will load in system libraries, hot spot >> compiler will compile some byte code to native code etc), and only then >> measure. And measure multiple runs as well. >> >> -+ Tatu +- >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XSL-Transformation-in-Xalan---Pls-help%21-tp19471054p19491140.html Sent from the Xalan - J - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
