The apache license doesn't have an advertising clause it has an acknowledgment clause. This is an important difference, because it just means credit must be given in the documentation somewhere, it doesn't mean it has to be made more public then that. Are you maybe confusing it with the BSD license or is there a new Apache license that I am unaware of?

On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 02:42 PM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering if the older Apache license (with the advertising clause)
was an intentional choice for the xmldb api? Will the api be released under the newer version of the Apache license in the future?


Thanks, Kevin

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a message:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact administrator:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Kimbro Staken
The dbXML Project
http://www.dbxml.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a message:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact administrator:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to