On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:30:17AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > > >> If we did it in 1-degree by 1-degree sections the way that the USGS > >> distributes them, this whole scheme would be much more workable. We > >> might be able to get some of the DRG collection groups to contribute > >> data too 'cuz they'd be benefitting from ours.
Not that it matters much, but USGS dropped the 1-degree by 1-degree distribution method years ago. Doesn't mean that it's a bad way to go, but it *isn't* the way USGS does it. Their "data partners" tend to do it by state now. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." -- R. Bach _______________________________________________ Xastir mailing list Xastir@xastir.org http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir