On 2011/03/07 14:26, Reno Bladergroen <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for my ignorance, but I'm an end-user, so all those terms are > still a little difficult. > I do know a little more than the average user, but still... > Why I expect it that way, is because WM does, this way you get a > virtual serial BT IN and OUT port automatically.
WM has support for incoming RFCOMM connections, and has built-in drivers for turning an incoming RFCOMM connection into a virtual COM port. Android does not have the notion of "COM ports" at all (because it does not need to), and so the OS cannot provide any drivers for emulating COM ports. > It's like negotiating first, from both sides. If the PDA is not saying > it has a serial service, the Mac will not advertise because it doesn't > need to. That doesn't make any sense. RFCOMM does not require both sides to advertise a port. Only one peer needs to, and the other connects to it. > In this case I need to look at the settings for the connection TO, not > from, the mac. In my previous mail the "In" picture. I saw that picture, but I cannot explain anything about Macs, because I don't own one, and I have never used one. I don't know what it means. Max ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ Xcsoar-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcsoar-user
