On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 10:01 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:51:54 -0800, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> I'd prefer to remove the config file to remove functionality. This > >> would make it easier for scripts to detect with [ -f ]. If config > >> file exist specific directories could be disabled by commenting them > >> out (not specifying them). > > > > I'm not sure what you mean. The config file is read by the program run > > on login that creates/updates directories. Nothing else should really > > read it. Why would they want to do that anyway? For instance, the users > > ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs file might be totally manually written and not > > generated from the config at all. > > > > Right, the [ -f ] should never be neeeded, but if root needs to do some > manteinance on a home dir by any chance, this make it easier. > > I am thinking that the default user config file should read the /etc > version to take the defaults if the user hasn't decided to tweak them. The > file could > be easily provided by /etc/skel. Functionality would be as simple as removing > the config file. (Read: opt-in approach, with everybody opted-in by > default).
I don't quite understand what you mean. Are you talking about the user-dirs.conf file or the user-dirs.defaults file? Also, /etc/skel is not generally a great way to add stuff. It only works for newly created users. Not for things like distro upgrades, old NFS homedirs, etc. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] He's a superhumanly strong Republican messiah in a wheelchair. She's a violent impetuous vampire with an MBA from Harvard. They fight crime! _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg