Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:10 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote: > > Rodney Dawes wrote: > > > This would also solve the "Accessibility" "issue" that Stanislav brought > > > up in his mail, wanting a category for "something that provides an > > > additional service, but isn't a standalone app 'window'". > > > > It still does not solve the problem, which secondary category fits the > > application (Service), which simply "makes desktop more usable". > > "makes desktop more usable" is a subjective measurement, in this > example, not objective.
I want "Utility;Desktop", not Prettification. Something targeted to desktop itself. "Makes desktop more usable" or "application which helps to organize windows" is maybe a subjective measurement. But please show me to a correct secondary category for it in the current specs. > On top of the secondary categories, we also have the reserved categories > for Screensaver, TrayIcon, and Applet to use. These probably all fit the > type of "apps" you want to have a new special Prettification category > for. It is not Screensaver, TrayIcon nor Applet. > The secondary category for a "Service" would > be related to the service it provides. For example, an OBEX FTP service > should have FileTransfer as an additional category. Vino would have > RemoteAccess. I don't think having additional categories for subjective > metrics such as "makes *my* desktop prettier for *me*" is appropriate > for a standardized specification. Primary category Service gives perfect sense. -- Best Regards / S pozdravem, Stanislav Brabec software developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/ _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
