On Monday 15 April 2013 21:40:52 Jerome Leclanche wrote: > Ah sorry, I thought you wanted to store it in multiple separate files :)
No, TRASH_DIR/directorysizes will contain the multiple lines I showed in my email. > The simple file format is nice however I have a small concern about > extensibility; any new value added is going to break backwards > compatibility, unless we specify that additional values may be eventually > added. There isn't much to add in order to solve the question 'how big is this directory'. No extensibility is needed here. > Performance-wise, does it really matter that much? There should/will be an > ini parser because of the trashinfo files anyway. Yes, parsing 1000 files is really a lot slower than parsing one file. Due to I/O, and due to cache locality. The whole point of a cache is to be fast, otherwise we wouldn't be doing this in the first place. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg