On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:56 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > On Monday 15 April 2013 21:40:52 Jerome Leclanche wrote: > > Ah sorry, I thought you wanted to store it in multiple separate files :) > > No, TRASH_DIR/directorysizes will contain the multiple lines I showed in my > email. > > > The simple file format is nice however I have a small concern about > > extensibility; any new value added is going to break backwards > > compatibility, unless we specify that additional values may be eventually > > added. > > There isn't much to add in order to solve the question 'how big is this > directory'. No extensibility is needed here. > > > Performance-wise, does it really matter that much? There should/will be > an > > ini parser because of the trashinfo files anyway. > > Yes, parsing 1000 files is really a lot slower than parsing one file. > Due to I/O, and due to cache locality. > The whole point of a cache is to be fast, otherwise we wouldn't be doing > this > in the first place. >
I meant does it matter that much to avoid an ini-based format there (keeping, of course, the single file) > > -- > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 > > J. Leclanche
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
