> >Personally I prefer fixed-not-closed/close-before-release, but heck, > >it's for weeks we're in before-release state :o) > > One drawback to that method is that the SF Tracker browse list doesn't > show > the Resolved field, so you can't tell which ones have/haven't been fixed > yet > without opening them up.
Oh yeah, we use a bug tracking system in our company which is based on Lotus Domino and lets you do this, I'm quite accustomed to this way of marking bugs in that system. > Alternatively, given that the reason for leaving them open is to have a > handy list of what needs testing before release, maybe we could use the > Group field for that instead somehow? e.g. filter on Status: Closed & > Group: 1.1 to show everything that's been added into the 1.1 release, > which > needs testing. That would need us to use the Group field as the 'fixed > in' > version rather than the 'found in' version, though. I agree. Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
