I think we should try to break the tight coupling with Ant. There will always be people who want to use XDoclet, but not Ant. -Simply because they don't have time to learn to write Ant scripts. Believe me, these people exist.
Currently the Ant coupling is related to Ant tasks and property replacement. It should be possible to invoke XDoclet via an Antless API too (IDEs plugins would like that I think) Therefore, I think we should _not_ couple ourself more to Ant than we probably are. My 0.02$ Aslak > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathias > Bogaert > Sent: 16. mai 2002 04:02 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Verbose > > > Ant has rich capabilities to do logging (-v(erbose), -outputfile, -debug > etc). But now that I migrated the entire logging stuff to > commons-logging, I > feel no need to go logging through Ant. > On the other hand, Ant is our 'father' app, so we should output everything > using ant. > > Migrating, this time to Ant, will be another big task, so maybe something > for the next release. > > What do you guys think? > > Mathias > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
