I agree 111% with that ;-) It's good to have you lurking here Erik!
Aslak > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 15. mai 2002 19:40 > To: Aslak Helles�y; Mathias Bogaert; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Verbose > > > And I agree with this sentiment 110%. Its just good software design to > reduce coupling anyway. > > But, it still remains that when you are running within Ant your output > should go through Ant's mechanisms. The same will be true for IDE > integration - you'll want your output to go through its mechanisms. > > Have a look at Ant's new <input> task at how its implemented - this is a > task that allows pluggable InputHandlers so that Ant could get input from > console, properties files, or from a GUI. Perhaps something like that > should be applied to XDoclet where its got its own internal > logging API that > writes to Ant's log when running within Ant and adapts to other mechanisms > when not within Ant. > > Erik > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aslak Helles�y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mathias Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:21 PM > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Verbose > > > > I think we should try to break the tight coupling with Ant. There will > > always be people who want to use XDoclet, but not Ant. -Simply because > they > > don't have time to learn to write Ant scripts. Believe me, these people > > exist. > > > > Currently the Ant coupling is related to Ant tasks and property > replacement. > > It should be possible to invoke XDoclet via an Antless API too (IDEs > plugins > > would like that I think) > > > > Therefore, I think we should _not_ couple ourself more to Ant than we > > probably are. > > > > My 0.02$ > > > > Aslak > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathias > > > Bogaert > > > Sent: 16. mai 2002 04:02 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Verbose > > > > > > > > > Ant has rich capabilities to do logging (-v(erbose), > -outputfile, -debug > > > etc). But now that I migrated the entire logging stuff to > > > commons-logging, I > > > feel no need to go logging through Ant. > > > On the other hand, Ant is our 'father' app, so we should output > everything > > > using ant. > > > > > > Migrating, this time to Ant, will be another big task, so maybe > something > > > for the next release. > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > Mathias > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We > supply > > > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download > mirrors. We supply > > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
