Hi Aslak, What is the relationship between Middlegen and XDoclet2 going to be like going forward? Will there be tighter coupling between the two? Shared metadata model? I haven't seen any details (beside vague hints in the roadmap and you're answer re: jdk1.5 about this anywhere.
For instance, I've been bitten by differences in the way XDoclet and Middlegen do variable naming (I saw that the original SF.net cvs checkin for middlegen.Util.java's decapitalize() method used java.beans.Introspector.decapitalize() -- what XDoclet uses -- but that that was abadoned. My local middlegen tree has a mod by me to go back to using Introspector's version. Sorry, I suppose this is slightly off-topic WRT the Jakarta proposal. Dave --- Aslak_Helles�y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'll start preparing a proposal for Jakarta > membership for XDoclet2 next > week. I'll post drafts here before I submit the > final proposal. > > Aslak > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay > Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! > Click here: > http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 > _______________________________________________ > xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
