Blame Google http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=unmodifiableCollection&btnI=I'm+Feeling+Lucky&meta= ;-) If it's standard Collections stuff, forget I said anything...
Andrew. On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 05:32, Matthias Germann wrote: > IMHO, he would like to use the java.util.Collections class to get > unmodifiable Collections and not the commons-collections library. > > Regards, > Mathhias > > Andrew Stevens schrieb: > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:17, Ward, Tyler wrote: > > > >>As a result, I made the following changes. > >>... > >>4) All returned [Collection|Set]s are > >>Collections.unmodifiable[Collection|Set](...). > >>5) Added get*Collection() method that returns unmodifiable [Collection|Set] > >>of the relations. > > > > > > UnmodifiableCollection is part of the Apache commons-collections > > library, isn't it? I don't think we should introduce dependencies on > > third-party libraries in generated code, unless it's optional (e.g. a > > config parameter or @ejb.value-object > > use-unmodifiable-collections="true" parameter, defaulting to false). > > For some things it's appropriate (it's a no-brainer that the Struts jar > > is required to compile generated Struts form beans), but while we might > > use commons-collections to run XDoclet that doesn't mean we should force > > people to use it to compile their own (and generated) code. > > > > > > Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ xdoclet-devel mailing list xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
