Hi,
On 19/11/2014 09:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 16:59 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ian,
On 11/18/2014 04:44 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
---
xen/arch/arm/Rules.mk | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Rules.mk b/xen/arch/arm/Rules.mk
index 572d854..ef887a5 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Rules.mk
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Rules.mk
@@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ EARLY_PRINTK_BAUD := 115200
EARLY_UART_BASE_ADDRESS := 0x1c020000
EARLY_UART_REG_SHIFT := 2
endif
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK), xgene-mcdivitt)
+EARLY_PRINTK_INC := 8250
+EARLY_PRINTK_BAUD := 9600
EARLY_PRINTK_BAUD is not necessary as we don't use the initialization
function (EARLY_PRINTK_INIT_UART is not set).
Oh yes, oops. Also the baud is not even what is actually used, so it's
not even serving a documentary purpose.
With the EARLY_PRINTK_BAUD dropped, this could be merged with the
xgene-storm early printk
It's at a different base address. Long term I either want to make this
(somewhat) runtime configurable or at least to rationalise the options
into the form <soc/soc-family>-uart<N>, or perhaps even <8250|pl011|
etc>@<address>[,<rate><settings>], if it's not to skanky to arrange to
parse that somewhere in the build system. Not for 4.5 though.
You mean the patch generally or the merging?
I meant rationalise the number of early printk. This patch looks fine
for me.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel