> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:21 AM
> To: Hu, Robert
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; jfeh...@suse.com;
> wei.l...@citrix.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX
> Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 12/12] Changes to test step of xen install
> 
> Robert Ho writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST 12/12] Changes to test step of xen
> install"):
> >  This patch accomodates ts-xen-install to nested L1 xen installation
> >  usage. Its change is relatively simpler than
> >  ts-debain-hvm-install. We simply alter '$ho' usage to 'w_ho', which
> >  is assigned to '$ho' in original L0 installation context, while
> >  assigned to '$gho' in L1 Xen installation context.
> 
> Certainly I think we should use ts-xen-install for installing Xen on
> the L1.  But I think that ts-xen-install should probably think almost
> entirely about the L1 and $ho should be the L1.
> 
> I think if you followed the suggestion for the structure that I made
> in my previous patch, very little of the changes here would be
> necessary.
> 
> It's not clear to me that _anything_ would need to change in
> ts-xen-install, in fact.  (Although I may be wrong.)
Going to read selecthost() and its relative callers deeper, I think you
are right.
What needs to be change is the selecthost() not xen install.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to