> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:21 AM > To: Hu, Robert > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; jfeh...@suse.com; > wei.l...@citrix.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX > Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 12/12] Changes to test step of xen install > > Robert Ho writes ("[PATCH OSSTEST 12/12] Changes to test step of xen > install"): > > This patch accomodates ts-xen-install to nested L1 xen installation > > usage. Its change is relatively simpler than > > ts-debain-hvm-install. We simply alter '$ho' usage to 'w_ho', which > > is assigned to '$ho' in original L0 installation context, while > > assigned to '$gho' in L1 Xen installation context. > > Certainly I think we should use ts-xen-install for installing Xen on > the L1. But I think that ts-xen-install should probably think almost > entirely about the L1 and $ho should be the L1. > > I think if you followed the suggestion for the structure that I made > in my previous patch, very little of the changes here would be > necessary. > > It's not clear to me that _anything_ would need to change in > ts-xen-install, in fact. (Although I may be wrong.) Going to read selecthost() and its relative callers deeper, I think you are right. What needs to be change is the selecthost() not xen install. > > Thanks, > Ian.
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel