Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 19/24] libxl: define LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA"):
> Yes, something like that. It would be better if the precise wording
> were more similar to that for the other HAVE macros. How about:
>
> * If this is defined the type libxl_vnode_info exists, and a
> * field 'vnuma_nodes' is present in libxl_domain_build_info.
>
> or similar ?
BTW, this may seem picky, but it is much easier to quickly find the
relevant one out of a lot of textual descriptions if there aren't any
unnecessary differences.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
