On 11/18/2015 03:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com> wrote:

Can you just add !xen_pv_domain() to the opportunistic SYSRET check
instead?  Bury the alternatives in that macro, ie.
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XENPV).  That would likely benefit other
code as well.
We could, but that won't help the 64-bit case where we want to keep
the full asm path.

I don't think I understand what you mean here. Which full asm path?

-boris



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to