On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:21:56PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Could we make this a little less subtle:
> 
> ALTERNATIVE "testl %eax, %eax; lz .Lsyscall_32_done", "jmp
> .Lsyscasll_32_done", X86_FEATURE_XENPV
> 
> Borislav, what do you think?

I don't mind either.

I would've said your version doesn't touch %eax so the result in there
might be useful for callers but all paths do overwrite it, AFAICT.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 
(AG Nürnberg)
-- 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to