>>> On 10.02.16 at 17:44, <ta...@tklengyel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com> > wrote: > >> Rename: >> - arch/x86/monitor_x86.c -> arch/x86/monitor.c >> - asm-{x86,arm}/monitor_arch.h -> asm-{x86,arm}/monitor.h >> >> (previous commit explains why these renames were necessary) >> > > Referencing a "previous commit" like this is not acceptable as you don't > know how these patches will get applied and there might be other patches > that get committed in-between yours. In each patch explain clearly why the > patch is needed. I still find it odd that you need to rename x86/monitor.c > -> x86/monitor_x86.c -> x86/monitor.c in the same series.
Indeed. Thinking about it again perhaps the operations should be "move to common/ (mostly) verbatim" followed by "break out x86 specific code" (if that's the smaller portion compared to what is to stay). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel