>>> On 08.08.16 at 15:41, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
> @@ -2903,6 +2903,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs
> *regs)
> {
> vpmu_msr = 1;
> case MSR_AMD_FAM15H_EVNTSEL0...MSR_AMD_FAM15H_PERFCTR5:
> + case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0...MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
> if ( vpmu_msr || (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
> X86_VENDOR_AMD) )
> {
> if ( (vpmu_mode & XENPMU_MODE_ALL) &&
> @@ -3030,6 +3031,7 @@ static int emulate_privileged_op(struct cpu_user_regs
> *regs)
> {
> vpmu_msr = 1;
> case MSR_AMD_FAM15H_EVNTSEL0...MSR_AMD_FAM15H_PERFCTR5:
> + case MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0...MSR_K7_PERFCTR3:
> if ( vpmu_msr || (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor ==
> X86_VENDOR_AMD) )
> {
>
And all the logic in vpmu_amd.c is already in suitable shape? Namely
I'm wondering whether CTRL_RSVD_MASK indeed applies uniformly
to both the pre-Fam15 and Fam15+ MSRs.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
