On 14/03/2023 4:30 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.03.2023 08:54, Huang Rui wrote:
>> From: Chen Jiqian <jiqian.c...@amd.com>
> An empty description won't do here. First of all you need to address the Why?
> As already hinted at in the reply to the earlier patch, it looks like you're
> breaking the intended IRQ model for PVH.

I think this is rather unfair.

Until you can point to the document which describes how IRQs are
intended to work in PVH, I'd say this series is pretty damn good attempt
to make something that functions, in the absence of any guidance.

~Andrew

P.S. If it isn't obvious, this is a giant hint that something should be
written down...

Reply via email to