>>> On 04.07.18 at 12:40, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > On 04/07/18 09:17, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Personally I'd favor the top level variants, as that makes >> sufficiently clear that the code is neither specific to the hypervisor >> nor specific to the tools. > > That's the concern I've got with the top level variant. I view this as > hypervisor code which we also want to use in libxc, rather than > specifically separate code.
But isn't the nature of library code to be used in different environments? Hence why would you want this specifically qualified as hypervisor code? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
