On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 09:03:02PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > More than the bottom two bits are now defined, and the MSR policy work has > shown that using non-architectural representations turns out to be problematic > for more than just asm code. As the architectural representation is the > expected default, we don't need to justify why we are using it.
If that's indeed the architectural representation shouldn't you use a uint64_t instead? > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
