On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:49:39AM +0200, Orzel, Michal wrote:
> 
> 
> On 24/06/2025 05:55, dm...@proton.me wrote:
> > From: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com>
> >
> > Move vpl011 DT node parsing from common Arm code to PL011 emulator code.
> It's not parsing, it's DT node generation.

Oh, that's right, overlooked.
Thanks, will update.

> 
> We usually keep all the DT node generation functions in one place. I'm not 
> sure
> if we want to move them to respective drivers (i.e. vpl011 to vpl011.c, gicv3 
> to
> gicv3.c, etc.). Not sure what other maintainers think.
> 
> >
> > While doing it pick the generic name vuart_add_fwnode() for DT parser 
> > function
> What 'fw' stands for? Firmware? This function creates DT node for domU, so it
> should better be sth like vuart_add_dt_node().

'fw' stands for 'firmware'.

It should be some generic name because the function will be used on x86 to
generate to generate the guest ACPI tables.

> 
> ~Michal
> 
> 


Reply via email to