On 24/06/2025 05:55, dm...@proton.me wrote: > From: Denis Mukhin <dmuk...@ford.com> > > Move vpl011 DT node parsing from common Arm code to PL011 emulator code. It's not parsing, it's DT node generation. We usually keep all the DT node generation functions in one place. I'm not sure if we want to move them to respective drivers (i.e. vpl011 to vpl011.c, gicv3 to gicv3.c, etc.). Not sure what other maintainers think. > > While doing it pick the generic name vuart_add_fwnode() for DT parser function What 'fw' stands for? Firmware? This function creates DT node for domU, so it should better be sth like vuart_add_dt_node(). ~Michal
- [PATCH v1 01/16] arm/vpl011: rename virtual PL011 Kconfig op... dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 05/16] arm/vpl011: use void pointer in domain stru... dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 15/16] drivers/vuart: introduce framework for UART... dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 16/16] drivers/vuart: hook simple MMIO-based UART ... dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 12/16] xen/domain: introduce domain-emu.h dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 06/16] arm/vpl011: remove vpl011 header file dmkhn
- [PATCH v1 02/16] arm/vpl011: move DT node parsing to PL011 e... dmkhn
- Re: [PATCH v1 02/16] arm/vpl011: move DT node parsing t... Orzel, Michal
- Re: [PATCH v1 13/16] drivers/vuart: move PL011 emulator code Jan Beulich
- Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] drivers/vuart: move simple MMIO-based U... Jan Beulich