On Tue Jan 20, 2026 at 11:20 AM CET, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 20.01.2026 10:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: >> The only dependency here is patch 2 going in before patch 3. Everything else >> can be freely rearranged. > > Is this correct? Didn't you say (confirming what I observed elsewhere a little > while back) that there's a complaint when a file listed in the exclusions > doesn't > exist anymore (which may have been cppcheck, not Eclair, but still breaking > CI)? > IOW can patch 4 really be separate from patch 3? Or, if its description was to > be trusted, wouldn't it need to go ahead of what is now patch 3?
Doh, you're right, they are out of order. Patch 4 now just removes the exclusion so it's fine to do it separately. So patch3 <-> patch4. Cheers, Alejandro
