On 20.01.2026 11:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > On Tue Jan 20, 2026 at 11:20 AM CET, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 20.01.2026 10:38, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: >>> The only dependency here is patch 2 going in before patch 3. Everything else >>> can be freely rearranged. >> >> Is this correct? Didn't you say (confirming what I observed elsewhere a >> little >> while back) that there's a complaint when a file listed in the exclusions >> doesn't >> exist anymore (which may have been cppcheck, not Eclair, but still breaking >> CI)? >> IOW can patch 4 really be separate from patch 3? Or, if its description was >> to >> be trusted, wouldn't it need to go ahead of what is now patch 3? > > Doh, you're right, they are out of order. Patch 4 now just removes the > exclusion > so it's fine to do it separately.
I.e. the description there saying "it's clean" is accurate, and it was excluded for (effectively) no reason? > So patch3 <-> patch4. Noted. Jan
