On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 28.09.18 at 10:24, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > The relocation code in __start_xen requires one extra element in the > > module array. By the looks of it the temporary array is already large > > enough. Add a BUG_ON to catch any issue in the future. > > > > While at it, turn another ASSERT to BUG_ON as well. > > Hmm, a little strange - I thought we had agreed on panic() before. > The extra output BUG_ON() produces is unlikely to be helpful here. > With this switched to panic() it certainly can have my ack.
Oops, I have no idea why I agreed to use panic but wrote BUG_ON instead. My memory has failed me. I will resend this patch. Wei. > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
