>>> On 28.09.18 at 17:12, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:08:34AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 28.09.18 at 10:24, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
>> > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
>> > @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ static uint32_t conringc, conringp;
>> >  static int __read_mostly sercon_handle = -1;
>> >  
>> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> > -static bool __read_mostly opt_console_xen; /* console=xen */
>> > +/* Set to true at start of day to catch early boot issues */
>> > +static bool __read_mostly opt_console_xen = true; /* console=xen */
>> 
>> When Andrew suggested this, iirc he said to make the variable
>> tristate. Otherwise ...
> 
> I figure it doesn't need to be tristate.
> 
>> 
>> > @@ -821,6 +822,10 @@ void __init console_init_preirq(void)
>> >  
>> >      serial_init_preirq();
>> >  
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> > +    opt_console_xen = false;
>> > +#endif
>> 
>> ... you possibly override a user specified "true" here.
> 
> Do I? This is right before option parsing, during which opt_console_xen
> is set.

Hmm, I see - I didn't recall we still have this ad hoc parsing in
place, instead of using custom_param(). But isn't this too early then,
as messages issued from the parsing code then would not be visible?

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to