On 2019/1/15 0:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 20.12.18 at 14:12, <pu...@hygon.cn> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ static int vpmu_arch_initialise(struct vcpu *v)
>>
>> switch ( vendor )
>> {
>> + case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
>> case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
>> ret = svm_vpmu_initialise(v);
>> break;
>> @@ -890,6 +891,7 @@ static int __init vpmu_init(void)
>>
>> switch ( vendor )
>> {
>> + case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
>> case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
>> if ( amd_vpmu_init() )
>> vpmu_mode = XENPMU_MODE_OFF;
>
> Here and everywhere else, may I ask that you do your insertions
> below the respective AMD ones instead of above?
In all the switch cases, if Hygon directly followed AMD's cases, the
insertions are placed above the respective AMD ones.
If Hygon used its own cases, such as in calc_ler_msr, the new cases
are placed below the AMD ones.
--
Regards,
Pu Wen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
