> -----Original Message----- > From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-boun...@lists.xenproject.org> On Behalf Of Ian > Jackson > Sent: 30 January 2020 17:32 > To: Durrant, Paul <pdurr...@amazon.co.uk> > Cc: Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; xen- > de...@lists.xenproject.org; Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of > INVALID_DOMID to the API > > Paul Durrant writes ("[PATCH v4 1/7] libxl: add definition of > INVALID_DOMID to the API"): > > Currently both xl and libxl have internal definitions of INVALID_DOMID > > which happen to be identical. However, for the purposes of describing > the > > behaviour of libxl_domain_create_new/restore() it is useful to have a > > specified invalid value for a domain id. > > Hi. (I'm replying to the 1/ here because I don't seem to have any 0/ > in my inbox...) >
Oh, I must have forgot to copy the combined cc list onto the cover letter. Sorry about that. > Thanks for all this. As well as your use case, which is in itself > valuable, I think this change is important for other reasons. > So I want to see it go in. > > You'll see I have replied with some comments about the implementation. > I hope you won't be discouraged. If you feel I am asking for too much > work I might be inclined to pick up some of this myself; if so, please > let me know. I definitely don't want this to be dropped. Don't worry, your feedback is fine... certainly not asking too much. Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel