Hi,
On 21/05/2020 00:45, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@xilinx.com>
It is not strictly needed. Call virt_to_phys on xen_io_tlb_start
instead. It will be useful not to have a start_dma_addr around with the
next patches.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@xilinx.com>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index a42129cba36e..b5e0492b07b9 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -52,8 +52,6 @@ static unsigned long xen_io_tlb_nslabs;
* Quick lookup value of the bus address of the IOTLB.
*/
-static u64 start_dma_addr;
-
/*
* Both of these functions should avoid XEN_PFN_PHYS because phys_addr_t
* can be 32bit when dma_addr_t is 64bit leading to a loss in
@@ -241,7 +239,6 @@ int __ref xen_swiotlb_init(int verbose, bool early)
m_ret = XEN_SWIOTLB_EFIXUP;
goto error;
}
- start_dma_addr = xen_virt_to_bus(xen_io_tlb_start);
if (early) {
if (swiotlb_init_with_tbl(xen_io_tlb_start, xen_io_tlb_nslabs,
verbose))
@@ -389,7 +386,7 @@ static dma_addr_t xen_swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev,
struct page *page,
*/
trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, dev_addr, size, swiotlb_force);
- map = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, start_dma_addr, phys,
+ map = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, virt_to_phys(xen_io_tlb_start), phys,
xen_virt_to_bus() is implemented as xen_phys_to_bus(virt_to_phys()). Can
you explain how the two are equivalent?
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall