On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:10:44PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > So all the moving parts are in one function. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > --- > CC: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > CC: Wei Liu <w...@xen.org> > CC: Marek Kasiewicz <marek.kasiew...@3mdeb.com> > CC: Norbert Kamiński <norbert.kamin...@3mdeb.com> > CC: Michal Zygowski <michal.zygow...@3mdeb.com> > CC: Piotr Krol <piotr.k...@3mdeb.co> > CC: Krystian Hebel <krystian.he...@3mdeb.com> > CC: Daniel P. Smith <dpsm...@apertussolutions.com> > CC: Rich Persaud <pers...@gmail.com> > CC: Christopher Clark <christopher.w.cl...@gmail.com> > --- > xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > index 67e727cebd..9eca452ce1 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > @@ -426,6 +426,13 @@ static int wakeup_secondary_cpu(int phys_apicid, > unsigned long start_eip) > int maxlvt, timeout, i; > > /* > + * Some versions of tboot might be able to handle the entire wake > sequence > + * on our behalf. > + */ > + if ( tboot_in_measured_env() && tboot_wake_ap(phys_apicid, start_eip) )
I think you are missing a ! in front of tboot_wake_ap? Thanks, Roger.
