> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jacob Ritorto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [xen-discuss] Will b96 have Xen 3.2.x?
> To: Boris Derzhavets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Have you seen NetWare run correctly using SUSE's Xen?
> I researched it
> ut found that people were complaining about the same
> problems I had
> encountered using OpenSolaris.. If it's stable there
> and not in
> OpenSolaris at this time, then the choice is obvious
> -- just a matter
> of getting mgmt to swallow the Linux pill. This is
> where the 'hippie'
> perception comes in and if it fails, then *I'm* the
> guy who brought Linux into the enterprise..
I believe the core issue is Netware PV DomU no matter of Xen Hypervisor
running on Nevada or on RHEL 5.X
I don't want every time to be concerned about disabling checksum offloading at
DomU (no matter SNV or Linux type) working with rge driver on SNV Dom0, waiting
for corresponding CR to be committed
It's very personal, but I prefer SNV DomU running at Xen 3.2.1 RHEL 5.2 Dom0
vs SNV Dom0.
RH brought Linux to Enterprise a while ago and nothing bad happened
RH and Citrix brought Xen Hypervisor (Linux Dom0) to Enterprise and
nothing bad happened .
3.2.1 is faster then 3.1.4 running HVM DomUs no matter of OS.
RH brought Jboss-Seam and RH Developer Studio to Enterprise and nothing bad
happened again.
// NetBeans 6.1 has you to encapsulate data management methods into backing
beans and performance suffer. Sun's Seam Gen Integration module (for 1.2.1 GA)
fails on 6.1 ( released for 5.5.1)
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Boris Derzhavets
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my very personal opinion and experience
> > bringing Nevada to Dom0 vs RHEL 5.2 , OpenSuse 11
> (SLES 10 SP2)
> > mostly looks as a hippie political stunt due to
> Solaris xVM (Nevada) to
> > be under heavy development at mean time :-)
> >
> >
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > xen-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> _______________________________________________
> xen-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]