Thank you for your answer.

I am not interested in OracleVM, the objective of this setup is to build a
platform with maximum flexibility. OpenSolaris/xVM is the ideal combination
thanks to Crossbow and ZFS obviously.

We are not Sun and/or Oracle customers therefore we are not in a position to
make such a suggestion. I was hoping to have my company start doing a little
OpenSolaris via the integration of this Xen platform.

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Henry Pepper <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you are using this for commercial use, isn't Oracle VM(OVM) a safer bet?
>  http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/vm/index.html
> On the oracle virtualization roadshow OVM was described and xVM wasn't
> mentioned.
>
> That said, I assume that the xVM is community driven, so if Linux can
> have xen, what should prevent OSOL from having a thriving community?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Antoine Benkemoun
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ah thank you for the reassuring news =)
> >
> > I'll just wait around to see if anyone has gotten Convirt to work on OSol
> as
> > that still interests me.
> >
> > Antoine
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Florian Manschwetus
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 08.04.2010 17:34, schrieb Antoine Benkemoun:
> >> > Wow that's a whole lot of pessimism... opensolaris-discuss list is way
> >> > more optimistic...
> >> >
> >> > I've done a little reading through the archive of this mailing list,
> >> > seems like the OpenSolaris port of Xen isn't active anymore. That's
> one
> >> > sad thing.
> >> >
> >> Uhm, in the xen-gate was activity right before Easter. So it looks not
> >> all abandoned.
> >> My hope is that oracle won't flush down the toilet one of there most
> >> valuable crown jewels.
> >> (But this part, was discussed already on this list)
> >>
> >> Florian
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xen-discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
>
_______________________________________________
xen-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to