Steven Scholz wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Steven Scholz wrote:
>> > Hi Gilles,
>> >
>> > >> Ok, found the bug (actually, Philippe did), as almost expected, the way
>> > >> it is related to the latency program period is not really obvious. The
>> > >> bug is that in the macro "irq_handler" in entry-armv.S, the return value
>> > >> (in r0) of __ipipe_grab_irq is overriden by the subsequent call to
>> > >> get_irqnr_and_base.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Here comes a patch. Note that it will only work correctly with
>> > > CONFIG_PREEMPT disabled for now.
>> >
>> > Any progress with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled ?
>>
>>enabling CONFIG_PREEMPT almost works. But non real-time tasks system
>>calls fail from time to time.
>
>
> But I do need a new patch?
>
> Cause with last patch I get "BUG()" in schedule ...
The patch that almost works with CONFIG_PREEMPT only exist on Philippe's
disk, it has not been released.
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
