> > I am aware of this. For the current machine I will stick to this. > > > > Then don't complain. :) Yes sir! :) Not complaining really, I think and I hope that the latency of 30us average will do nicely for me. Just curious actually.
> > to be give worse latencies than much slower machines. Are the 2 > > interrupts causing the latency? > > Those two increase the latency of code in timed tasks, for sure. The > question is if your measurement on the slower machine also included this > scenario (timer event + 2 IRQs in a row). This definitely doesn't happen > often, and maybe timing on the slower box makes it less likely. Or there > is one potential IRQ source more on your fast box (e.g. due to IRQ > sharing on the slower one). > > You see, RT system design on the edge (ie. when hunting a few 10 us) is > tricky and not easily portable from box X to box Y. Its not possible to determine which IRQ's are responsible for this from the trace I presume? Roland > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ Xenomai-help mailing list Xenomai-help@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
