On 03/03/2014 07:32 PM, Bruno Tunes de Mello wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > I did the tests you said to verify the system's behavior with load . > > I executed some tests using commands 'stress', cpuburn for Cortex A8 and > dohell with LTP, for more than 20 minutes each one. > I printed 3 results using some of these tools together: > http://pastebin.com/VFavnaxW > In each test it's indicated the commands used to generate load. > > It's just to confirm if it's all right.
71us may be a bit high, but have you run xeno-test and latency at the same time? xeno-test runs latency, so, if you also run the latency test separately, one latency test will perturb the results of the other. Also, something I noted on omap4, I have no explanation, but it seems latency is better on cpu 0, also, running dohell with all the options should provide a harder load. I use: xeno-test -l "dohell -s 192.168.0.5 -m /mnt -l /ltp" -c 0 -p 100 -g histo Where 192.168.0.5 has the "discard" service enabled in inetd.conf (the discard service is not enabled by default). And an USB key is mounted on /mnt. The generated "histo" files can be used with scripts/histo.gp to generate histograms like: http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/core-3.10-latencies/panda.png Note that since the feedback from mx6 users about the L2 "write-allocate" bit, the panda board latency dropped down to about 25us. -- Gilles. _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
