On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:38:17PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:06:39PM +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Then we have a problem, because once the irq has been enabled for
> > Xenomai, it is almost certainly wrong for a power management call to
> > change its register. So, probably power management should be
> > disabled like on x86.
> 
> Perhaps, but TI's code doesn't compile if you turn it off at the moment.
> 
> > Yes that I what I meant, getting back the pointer to the structure
> > needed by the hwmod layer is going to be hard, since this pointer is
> > well hidden under the carpet.
> > 
> > Anyway, if anyone wants a better solution, he will implement it, I
> > will merge your patch in the current version of the I-pipe patch
> > (3.16.0).
> 
> I was even thinking of sending it upstream for suggestions.  Others using
> linux might want fast interrupts too.  But certainly useful for ipipe
> users so far.

Oh my, another Don Quijote. My prognostic: "the device tree is a
description of the hardware and should not contain such parameters".
But go ahead, try it.

-- 
                                            Gilles.

_______________________________________________
Xenomai mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Reply via email to