On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Lennart Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:21:50AM +0300, Ran Shalit wrote: >> We intend to use ipipe with zynq (we already have 3.12.0 kernel used with >> zynq). >> Do you think the patch should be relevant for zynq ? >> I see that xilinx have their own patch , but it is for older kernel 2.6.3 >> http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/Xenomai+for+Zynq#Xenomai for Zynq-7000 AP >> SoC Linux--Patch > > You can give it a try. The zynq does have a Cortex-A9 as far as I recall, > so it ought to work. Doesn't mean there aren't other bits that need > fixing in the zynq specific code. But maybe there isn't. > > Just remember it was never an officially supported kernel version. > It worked for us, it was given a once over by a proper xenomai developer > who did not seem to think it was wrong, but if it doesn't work I wouldn't > expect the xenomai developers to be excited to help fix it. > >> I also see that in git there is ipipe for 3.12.0 >> http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/log/?h=raw/for-ipipe-3.12.0 >> But again I am unsure if it is relevant for zynq too. > > Well that was a work in progress I believe and never officially released > as far as I recall. I started from that one, but the one I posted is > actually based on the 3.14 patch and backported as far as I recall. > It has been a while since we moved to 3.14. > > -- > Len Sorensen
Hi Len, We've first tried to apply the patch for 3.12.0 but there were too many errors, so we eventually used http://git.xenomai.org/ipipe-gch.git/log/?h=raw/for-ipipe-3.12.0 latest commit. I hope the ipipe should work without any issues wuth this tree. Is there a way to check if ipipe is OK with our version based on this commit ? Regards, Ran _______________________________________________ Xenomai mailing list [email protected] https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai
