Am Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:57:50 +0100
schrieb Mauro Salvini via Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'm testing same hardware of [1], with kernel 4.9.146 from ipipe-4.9.y
> with [2] applied, compiled with ARCH=i386 and Xenomai 3.0.7.

To be honest i386 is not really tested anymore, in fact in 4.14 not
even supported at the moment. If you can you should go for x86_64.

> Launching
> 
> xeno-test -l "dohell -s xxx -p yyy -m xxx 90000" -T 90000
> 
> I got this dump in dmesg, sometimes just after latency starts,
> sometimes after few seconds (side effect is a max latency value
> increase):
> 
> [  167.914184] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [  167.914208] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 606
> at 
> /home/build-ws/develop/linux-4.9.146/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h:511
> fpu__restore+0x1eb/0x2b0 [  167.914216] Modules linked in: intel_rapl
> intel_powerclamp iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support coretemp kvm_intel kvm
> irqbypass crc32_pclmul aesni_intel xts aes_i586 lrw gf128mul
> ablk_helper cryptd snd_pcm intel_cstate snd_timer evdev snd soundcore
> i915 pcspkr drm_kms_helper drm fb_sys_fops syscopyarea sysfillrect
> sysimgblt shpchp video lpc_ich mfd_core button ip_tables x_tables
> autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 fscrypto mbcache hid_generic usbhid hid
> mmc_block crc32c_intel i2c_i801 i2c_smbus igb i2c_algo_bit xhci_pci
> ptp pps_core xhci_hcd sdhci_pci sdhci usbcore mmc_core fjes [last
> unloaded: rtnet] [  167.914768] CPU: 0 PID: 606 Comm: dohell Not
> tainted 4.9.146+ #1 [  167.914772] Hardware name: Default string
> Default string/Q7-BW, BIOS V1.20#KW050220A 03/16/2018 [  167.914775]
> I-pipe domain: Linux [  167.914778]  f42e5e44 daeffa2d 00000000
> db335030 dac1ff3b f42e5e74 dac59dea db34504c [  167.914800]  00000000
> 0000025e db335030 000001ff dac1ff3b 000001ff f4291bc0 00000246
> [  167.914822]  f4291c00 f42e5e88 dac59efb 00000009 00000000 00000000
> f42e5ea4 dac1ff3b [  167.914843] Call Trace:
> [  167.914846]  [<daeffa2d>] dump_stack+0x9f/0xc2
> [  167.914849]  [<dac1ff3b>] ? fpu__restore+0x1eb/0x2b0
> [  167.914865]  [<dac59dea>] __warn+0xea/0x110
> [  167.914868]  [<dac1ff3b>] ? fpu__restore+0x1eb/0x2b0
> [  167.914871]  [<dac59efb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x2b/0x30
> [  167.914874]  [<dac1ff3b>] fpu__restore+0x1eb/0x2b0
> [  167.914877]  [<dac21b0a>] __fpu__restore_sig+0x2ba/0x680
> [  167.914879]  [<dac22141>] fpu__restore_sig+0x31/0x50
> [  167.914882]  [<dac13f52>] restore_sigcontext.isra.9+0xf2/0x110
> [  167.914885]  [<dac149b9>] sys_sigreturn+0xa9/0xc0
> [  167.914888]  [<dac019f5>] do_int80_syscall_32+0x85/0x190
> [  167.914891]  [<db1a56d5>] entry_INT80_32+0x31/0x31 [  167.914898]
> ---[ end trace e57344f10f300a76 ]---

I am not sure which path leads you there. But it could well be a state
that was caused by the ipipe patch.

could you try this:

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
@@ -426,6 +426,10 @@ void fpu__restore(struct fpu *fpu)
        /* Avoid __kernel_fpu_begin() right after fpregs_activate() */
        kernel_fpu_disable();
        trace_x86_fpu_before_restore(fpu);
+       if (fpregs_activate(fpu)) {
+               WARN_ON_FPU(fpu !=
this_cpu_read_stable(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx));
+               fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
+       }
        fpregs_activate(fpu);
        copy_kernel_to_fpregs(&fpu->state);
        trace_x86_fpu_after_restore(fpu);

This would not be a proper fix, especially if you end up seeing that
warning ...

Henning

> I found discussion at [3], and applied patch at [4] that comes from
> it, but result is the same.
> 
> Starting xeno-test without -l argument result is the same.
> Launching dohell alone (with same arguments as when launched from
> xeno- test -l), dump does not appear.
> 
> Could be a Xenomai-related problem (though the stack seems not concern
> Xenomai) or it is better to post it on LKML?
> 
> Thanks in advance, regards
> 
> Mauro
> 
> [1] https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2018-December/040142.html
> [2] https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2019-January/040172.html
> [3]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181120102635.ddv3fvavxajjlfqk@linutr
> onix.de/ [4]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/co
> mmit/?h=linux-4.9.y&id=d3741e0390287056011950493a641524f49fa05a
> 
> 


Reply via email to